jessicar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 200 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • jessicar
    Participant

    @Jon

    Do they include data up to R04 or R03 only?

    Not expecting anything relating to R04 until after their quality assurance date of 17/12/19 and certainly wasn’t expecting anything to be uploaded to the Hub! What time and date were they uploaded?

     
    in reply to: BI TOOLS RO4 #415912

    jessicar
    Participant

    The old hub has been decommissioned.

    At a guess on SLD in the Reports-History section. No communication has been released as of yet don’t think, but surely they will announce it in either the ESFA Update/Inform newsletter.

     
    in reply to: BI TOOLS RO4 #415900

    jessicar
    Participant

    They are not actually listed as an issue in a DSAT report from memory, but auditors use one of the listing reports to highlight students in this scenario – its a trick they have up their sleeve that some maybe not all may use.

    Agree – not always easy to find. Suppose you just have to rely on the 16-19 summary report and your own internal checks.

     
    in reply to: FM25 learners over 19 #414836

    jessicar
    Participant

    Its slow, but no where near as slow as R14 – maybe 30 mins?

    Taking a while to upload the file in the first place, but when you submit it afetr seeing the rule violations, seems to go through pretty quick.

     
    in reply to: R04 Submit Learner Data #414818

    jessicar
    Participant

    Also this funding rule from main providers document:

    P23 You must be satisfied that the employer is providing the apprentice with appropriate
    support and supervision to carry out their job role and their apprenticeship.

     
    in reply to: Unsupervised Apprentice #414816

    jessicar
    Participant

    My view is you are at fault as 19 year old with a 19/20 start date should be FM35 and can only be fully funded if they do not have a full level 3 qual – its an issue they look for at audit in your DSATs to try and catch you out.

    From memory, think its not a rule violation due to A Levels ie you could start AS at 18, A level at 19, but would still be FM25 funded due to it being an A Level 2 year programme, even though the dates seem to contradict this.

     
    in reply to: FM25 learners over 19 #414812

    jessicar
    Participant

    Breaks in learning can only be used in the following circumstances.

    “When the apprentice takes a period of leave from their work, for reasons such as
    medical treatment, maternity or paternity leave, this will be a break in the training
    they are to receive (a break in learning).”

    so you cannot use a break. Why are you wanting to use one?

    Surely they are unable to pass the apprenticeship without clinical experience?

     
    in reply to: Degree Apprenticeship BIL Query #414520

    jessicar
    Participant

    On a related issue I’ve also asked if there is anyway to download the DAS records as a csv file as that would have made it so much easier to send them back the data they wanted.

    Why oh why oh why cannot they provide us with this feature?! They managed it for the Agreement IDS but not for the data which actually need to interrogate when resolving DLOCK errors.

    I am always wanting to check ILR vs DAS, but have to do it via the Data Mismatch report, which can be a pain trying to connect all the data together in a format useful and readable to other departments.

     
    in reply to: Data Match Report #414514

    jessicar
    Participant

    Thanks Ruth – thats what i was getting at

     
    in reply to: Devolved area – Funding #414303

    jessicar
    Participant

    Hi Martin, Query relateds to SOF/non funded and not postcode

    Have a student in a devolved area, studying with ourselves who are not in a devolved area or have access to the funding in a devolved area, same as OP.

    Why do you suggest to record SOF as 113 (over recording it as non funded) when OP does not have an allocation for WECA?

     
    • This reply was modified 2 months, 3 weeks ago by  jessicar.
    in reply to: Devolved area – Funding #414245

    jessicar
    Participant

    Whats the advantage of recording SOF as 113 when you getting no money either way (unless you ask the devolved area for it)?

     
    in reply to: Devolved area – Funding #414227

    jessicar
    Participant

    There should be 2 reports when you submit to SLD. The summary is just that – the number of students in error, whereas the Rule Violations Report will list learners in error.

     
    in reply to: New Rule violation summary report #413208

    jessicar
    Participant

    @Ruth Its in the ERN User guide about using the ERN of the site

     
    in reply to: Employer Ref Numbers..? #412939

    jessicar
    Participant

    P311 is where is says it, just not in the words you want:
    Eligible if a EEA citizen (aka UK) AND have lived here for 3 years, therefore not automatically eligible.

    By reading the funding rules often enough, you learnt to read between the lines, which is a concept non funding staff find difficult to understand.

     
    in reply to: Apprenticeship Eligibility #411253

    jessicar
    Participant

    You can return all your learners for the academic year in the HUB and therefore see your position for the full year – you just need to ensure you extract them all from your MI system in your xml file

     
    in reply to: FIS – Sorry there is a problem #411224

    jessicar
    Participant

    What R14 reports are you referring to? The Hub should contain all the same reports as FIS generates.

     
    in reply to: FIS – Sorry there is a problem #411210

    jessicar
    Participant

    How were these learners coded at R14? Withdrawn?

     
    in reply to: R04 adjustment for incorrect Clawbacks #411207

    jessicar
    Participant

    Argh, see what they are referring to, but P311 is the key point. P337 is referring to the Overseas territories only (maybe a comma missing so they are interpreting this whole sentence incorrect?) Should maybe read as:
    P312 The European Economic Area (EEA) includes all the countries, AND THE territories listed below (from IN paragraph P337).

    and Yes to this as Brits are EEA citizens:
    The paragraph reference (311) references EEA citizens. So are we for the purposes of apprenticeship eligibility treating that paragraph as a cover all for everyone including British citizens?

     
    • This reply was modified 3 months, 1 week ago by  jessicar.
    • This reply was modified 3 months, 1 week ago by  jessicar.
    in reply to: Apprenticeship Eligibility #411202

    jessicar
    Participant

    They wouldn’t be eligible under paragraph 311 as they haven’t been living in the UK for the previous 3 years.

    However do they have any family members in the EEA who have lived there for 3 years+ whilst the apprentice has been in Australia? If so have a look at paragraphs 320 to 322 as they may qualify as being a family member of an EU/EEA citizen.

    Ps if you are not an employer provider these paragraph reference will be different in the other versions of the funding documents – but you need to be reading annex A

     
    in reply to: Apprenticeship Eligibility #411127

    jessicar
    Participant

    Go to SLD – Download Reports – History tab.

    Thats where they put R02 period end reports.

     
    in reply to: R03 Period End Reports #409884

    jessicar
    Participant

    @jackb

    Guessing this is why the system is down today as multiple providers have submitted the same file on SLD and also on the HUB. If the SLD is trying to upload the same file to the HUB, it may be encountering issues as the file is already there from your manual upload. Maybe not, but never known the Hub to be down after R14 before!

    The ESFA caused this themselves though – they should have switched one system off and made it very clear what we should and shouldn’t be submitting on.

     
    in reply to: ESFA Hub – Error #407044

    jessicar
    Participant

    @Ben_James Agreed but they ll argue the majority of your data should be resolved by R13 (6 weeks after the end of the academic year) and R14 is a bit of a last min tidy up.

    However as we all know, when you ve got hundreds of staff feeding you different snippets of learner information, you know there’s always someone who’s forgotten to tell you something or something comes out of the woodwork last min!

    PS also working with different exam boards and their timescales doesn’t help you to try and submit early either!

     
    • This reply was modified 4 months, 1 week ago by  jessicar.
    in reply to: ESFA Hub – Error #407035

    jessicar
    Participant

    Don’t know how your MIS system works but the EPA is attached to the enrolment not the learner.

    So when he learner went on the break in learning you should have something along the lines of:

    Enrolment 1
    Start date 01/09/2017
    Planned End Date 01/09/2022
    Actual End Date 01/06/2018
    EPA – Epa recorded against the enrolment

    And when they returned to learning, you should have create new enrolments ie:
    Enrolment 2
    Start date 01/09/2018
    Original Start Date 01/09/2017
    Planned End Date 01/10/2022
    Actual End Date null
    Restart indicator – true
    EPA – Epa recorded against the enrolment

     
    in reply to: FRM report no. 15 #406612

    jessicar
    Participant

    When did you input the EPA – after R13?

    The reports are always 3 weeks out of date. Other than that have you enter the EPA on the Break in learning enrolment as well as the restart enrolment?

     
    in reply to: FRM report no. 15 #406588

    jessicar
    Participant

    Have disappeared now so least don’t have to wait overnight!

     
    in reply to: When does DAS mismatch Report refresh? #406584
Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 200 total)