KateW

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 36 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • KateW
    Participant

    Hi Gaynor,

    Did you get a response? I have the exact same issue.

    Kind regards,
    Kate

     
    in reply to: EPA FAIL – RESIT – PASS #400582

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi Shason,

    The provider support manual states:

    7.4 Work preparation
    755. Work preparation can consist of either a regulated qualification or a non-regulated
    learning aim.
    756. For non-regulated work preparation aims, the learning aim you record depends on
    whether the traineeship is 16-19 funded or Adult skills funded:
    ļ‚· 16 to 18 traineeships (16-19 funded) should record one of the nonregulated work preparation aims from category E of Appendix H
    ļ‚· 19 to 24 traineeships (Adult skills funded) should record one of the nonregulated work preparation aims from category A of Appendix H

    I don’t know if this will help šŸ™‚

    Kate

     
    in reply to: Traineeship eligibility query #387040

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi Shason,

    Did you get any clarity on this?

    Kate

     
    in reply to: Traineeship eligibility query #386991

    KateW
    Participant

    Thank you both!

    In my blind panic i didn’t even think to look for another forum thread – I feel much better now!

     
    in reply to: PDSAT report 19A 404 #386955

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi all,

    I asked this of the data service last week:

    ‘Please could you advise on the below situation:

    Learner is planned to be on programme for 14 months but is ready to complete in 12 (assuming this is acceptable as per funding rules and framework)

    Would the learner only be required to complete the off the job based on 12 months of being on programme, or would they need to evidence off the job for the planned 14 months as per the original off the job plan?’

    The response was as follows:

    ‘They would need to evidence the off the job training for the original planned 14 month job plan.’

    So whatever is planned, must be evidenced, even if the learner completes early.

     
    in reply to: Recalculate OTJ for an early completion? #357038

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi Jenna,

    Where learners are 19-23, their first L2 qualification must come from the legal entitlements list.

    They can complete L1 quals but can not complete L2 local flex quals until they hold a legal entitlement qualification.

     
    in reply to: The Prior attainment is not valid for this learning aim #353083

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi all,

    We had this message this morning too!

    The issue we found was a learner who was completing functional skills (legal entitlement) had been coded as low wage.

    The low wage code wasn’t required as this learner would receive full funding regardless due to the qualifications being a legal entitlement.

    I hope this helps!

     
    in reply to: Errors – LDM 363 #350414

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi Ruth,

    It looks at first glance that they are all there on the summary (even the ones with no queries) however I’m missing 3 of them!

    Ill see if they are still missing last month.

     
    in reply to: FRM HUB reports #324956

    KateW
    Participant

    I’ve downloaded mine and some of the reports are missing from the summery – is this an indication that they are still a work in progress?

     
    in reply to: FRM HUB reports #324808

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi,

    Thank you for this.

    The reason I ask is because I am struggling to explain this to our assessors.
    We work with learners with the intention of them sitting the exams however i just wanted to check if it was or wasn’t a requirement that they passed.

    Kate

     
    in reply to: Traineeship #317981

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi sue,

    That would be great!

    katerwood1990@gmail.com

    Thank you so much for your help šŸ™‚

    We use OneFile to record which seems to work well.

     
    in reply to: off the job calculation #313878

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi Jack,

    This always confuses me but I think yes!

    Its 19-23 year olds which need a full (legal entitlement) level 2 prior to being able to complete anything from local flexibility.

    Obviously, as they are employed they would only be eligible for co-funding (unless they meet the low wage criteria) and the training couldn’t be delivered at the workplace.

    Kate

     
    in reply to: First level 2 AEB funding for Employees #281210

    KateW
    Participant

    I’ve been asked the same question today – but in relation to the new AEB low wage criteria being applied next year.

    Any thoughts anyone?

     
    in reply to: AEB – Self Employed #268012

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi Helen,

    As far as i’m aware, if the learner already holds a L2/L3 legal entitlement then they are eligible to complete a L2 local flexibility qualification.

    Kind regards,
    Kate

     
    in reply to: Funding Eligibility #263218

    KateW
    Participant

    Still awaiting ours too!

     
    in reply to: FE Choices – Response Rate Reports #249394

    KateW
    Participant

    Dawn and Martin, you are correct!

    Thankyou!

     
    in reply to: Apprenticeship Funding rules V6 #248436

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi Dawn,

    I have read that but it makes reference to V4 of the funding rules, not the new V6.

    Kind regards,
    Kate

     
    in reply to: Apprenticeship Funding rules V6 #248423

    KateW
    Participant

    I asked the data service and i got the below response:

    Hi Kate
    Thanks for your email
    You will find the summary of changes at the bottom of the first funding rules page V6
    I hope this helps with your query

    But they aren’t there!

     
    in reply to: Apprenticeship Funding rules V6 #248407

    KateW
    Participant

    Ah – I hadn’t missed it then!

    Just read it without it registering!

    Thank you!

     
    in reply to: Funding rules 18/19 #244557

    KateW
    Participant

    Hi Martin,

    Where is the summary of main changes located? I cant seem to find it!

    Friday brain!

     
    in reply to: Funding rules 18/19 #244553

    KateW
    Participant

    Steve you always make me feel reassured when you comment – glad to see that i’m on the same page as you with interpretation of the rules.

    Even if it does seem very bizarre!

     
    in reply to: Level 2 Eligibility #240955

    KateW
    Participant

    As far as I am aware it is still a requirement.

    Kate

     
    in reply to: Subcontractor Audit #227979

    KateW
    Participant

    I would think that as the learner told you at the start that they were exempt, and this was then confirmed later on, that all funding should be repaid.

    The funding rules state the below:

    P217. If an apprentice self-declares prior attainment, you must check this in the personal
    learning record (PLR) and query any contradictory information with the apprentice. The
    PLR will not necessarily override the apprenticeā€™s self-declaration.

     
    in reply to: FS Senario…? #226310

    KateW
    Participant

    Bump – please help!

     
    in reply to: BI Tools Reports R03 #217020

    KateW
    Participant

    I wasn’t expecting reports for R14 because we wouldn’t be able to make amendments to last years data now hard close has been completed.

    The next reports I think we will get will be R3 17/18.

    Kind regards,
    Kate

     
    in reply to: Funding Rules Monitoring Report – R14. #211518
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 36 total)